Lab report · 598 tests
Cinderella 99 lab report
What 598 state lab tests of Cinderella 99 flower show beyond a single THC number: the odds of a strong batch, how published figures hold up, how much the lab matters and how it reaches the shelf.1
Key findings
- 72% of 598 lab tests reached 20% THC or more; 16% reached 25%.1
- None of the 2 single published THC figures sits above the median lab result.1
- Ranks 6th of 29 strains by median THC (22.31%), with the 6th-narrowest spread of 24.1
- Lab medians differed by 7.35 points overall and by 7.35 within Maryland alone.1
- The highest-THC third of tests carried more terpenes than the lowest (2.36% vs 1.38% total).1
- Median THC rose 1.95 points from 2018 to 2023.1
- The 10th most listed of 16 strains in our Weedmaps snapshot (46 store listings).2
How likely is Cinderella 99 to test above 20% THC?
72% of 598 state lab tests of Cinderella 99 flower reached 20% total THC or more, about 7 in 10. 16% reached 25%, and none reached 30%.1
The odds depend on where the flower was tested: 75% of Maryland tests reached 20% (523 tests), against 65% in Washington (43).1 Each state has its own growers, labs and testing rules, so the gap describes markets as much as plants.
| Total THC | Tests at or above | Share of tests |
|---|---|---|
| 15% or more | 572 | 96% |
| 18% or more | 479 | 80% |
| 20% or more | 429 | 72% |
| 22% or more | 323 | 54% |
| 25% or more | 93 | 16% |
| 28% or more | 15 | 2.5% |
| 30% or more | 0 | 0% |
598 tests. Source: Cannlytics cannabis_results (CC BY 4.0), analysis by Official Cannabis.1
| State | Tests | Median THC | Share at 20% or more |
|---|---|---|---|
| Maryland | 523 | 22.53% | 75% |
| Washington | 43 | 22.84% | 65% |
Do published THC figures for Cinderella 99 match the lab results?
None of the 2 single published figures we checked sits above the median lab result for Cinderella 99 (22.31%).1 The highest figure, Leafly at 18%, was reached by 80% of tests.1,3
The 2 published ranges cover between 24% and 33% of tests, from 16–22% (AllBud) at the most to 15–20% (Herbies) at the fewest.1,4,5
None of these figures describes a particular jar; only the certificate of analysis for that batch does.
| Source | Published figure | Tests at or above it | Tests inside the range | Where it sits |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Herbies (seller)5 | 15–20% | 96% | 24% | most tests came in above it |
| The Cannigma6 | 15.7% | 89% | — | bottom quarter of tests |
| AllBud4 | 16–22% | 88% | 33% | most tests came in above it |
| Leafly3 | 18% | 80% | — | bottom quarter of tests |
"Tests at or above" counts results at or above the figure (for a range, its lower end). Lab data: Cannlytics cannabis_results (CC BY 4.0), analysis by Official Cannabis.1
How strong is Cinderella 99 compared with other strains?
By median total THC, Cinderella 99 ranks 6th of the 29 strains in our lab dataset (22.31%), between Lamb's Bread (22.74%) and Blueberry (21.91%).1 By the share of tests at 25% or more (16%), it ranks 9th.1
The middle half of its tests spans 4.67 points (19.48%–24.15%), the 6th-narrowest spread of the 24 strains with at least 30 tests: results under the name are more consistent than for most strains.1
| Rank | Strain | Median THC | Middle half | Tests |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4th | Chemdawg | 22.94% | 19.25%–25.37% | 668 |
| 5th | Lamb's Bread | 22.74% | 19.05%–25.37% | 117 |
| 6th | Cinderella 99 (this strain) | 22.31% | 19.48%–24.15% | 598 |
| 7th | Blueberry | 21.91% | 18.40%–25.23% | 411 |
| 8th | Sour Diesel | 21.68% | 19.00%–25.30% | 1,071 |
Same dataset and matching rules for every strain: Cannlytics cannabis_results (CC BY 4.0), analysis by Official Cannabis.1
Does the testing lab change Cinderella 99's THC result?
Among the 5 labs that tested Cinderella 99 at least 20 times, the median result ran from 16.47% (Lab D, Maryland) to 23.82% (Lab B, Maryland), a gap of 7.35 points.1
The gap is not only between states: within Maryland, the 4 labs with 20+ tests differed by 7.35 points (16.47%–23.82%).1
Labs test different growers’ flower, so a gap is not proof that one lab reads high; it shows how much the number on a label can depend on who grew and who tested the batch. Labs are anonymized here; the downloadable test file names them.
| Lab | State | Tests | Median THC | Share at 20% or more |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lab A | Maryland | 156 | 22.97% | 94% |
| Lab B | Maryland | 137 | 23.82% | 91% |
| Lab C | Maryland | 131 | 22.31% | 78% |
| Lab D | Maryland | 99 | 16.47% | 21% |
| Lab E | Washington | 39 | 23.24% | 69% |
5 of 15 labs tested Cinderella 99 20+ times. Lab A has the most tests. Source: Cannlytics cannabis_results (CC BY 4.0), analysis by Official Cannabis.1
Does higher-THC Cinderella 99 also have more terpenes?
Generally, yes. In the 520 tests that report both, the third with the most THC (23.58% or more) had a median of 2.36% total terpenes, against 1.38% for the third with the least (21.11% or less).1
The pattern holds in Maryland, the only state with at least 30 such tests.1 Total terpenes measure aroma compounds by weight; the comparison says nothing about effects.
| Tests from | Tests | Lowest-THC third | Highest-THC third |
|---|---|---|---|
| All states | 520 | 1.38% | 2.36% |
| Maryland | 515 | 1.38% | 2.37% |
Tests reporting both total THC and total terpenes. Source: Cannlytics cannabis_results (CC BY 4.0), analysis by Official Cannabis.1
Is Cinderella 99 getting stronger?
Median THC went from 22.85% in 2018 (68 tests) to 24.80% in 2023 (53), +1.95 points.1
Holding the state fixed tells the same story: in Maryland, the median went from 22.66% in 2018 to 24.76% in 2023, +2.10 points.1
Years with fewer than 20 tests are left out.
| Year | Tests | Median THC |
|---|---|---|
| 2018 | 68 | 22.85% |
| 2019 | 115 | 22.47% |
| 2020 | 104 | 23.07% |
| 2021 | 165 | 19.42% |
| 2022 | 85 | 22.62% |
| 2023 | 53 | 24.80% |
Source: Cannlytics cannabis_results (CC BY 4.0), analysis by Official Cannabis.1
In what forms, and under what names, does Cinderella 99 reach testing labs?
Of 798 lab results under exactly the name Cinderella 99, 78% were flower; shake and trim 22%, concentrates 0.8% and other or unrecorded 0.1%.1 Only flower enters the figures on this site.
Another 150 results carried a longer name that contains Cinderella 99, 16% of all results with the name in them, led by “49 DURBAN x CINDY 99” (84), “Madusa x Medusa x c99” (19) and “Chocolate Kush x Chocolope x c99 x Madusa x Medusa x c99” (12).1 Extra name words, cross markers and CBD versions mean these may not be the same plant, so they are excluded (how we match names).
| Form | Results | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Flower | 619 | 78% |
| Concentrates | 6 | 0.8% |
| Shake and trim | 172 | 22% |
| Other or unrecorded | 1 | 0.1% |
All product types, counted before de-duplication. Source: Cannlytics cannabis_results (CC BY 4.0), analysis by Official Cannabis.1
| Name on the lab result | Results |
|---|---|
| 49 DURBAN x CINDY 99 | 84 |
| Madusa x Medusa x c99 | 19 |
| Chocolate Kush x Chocolope x c99 x Madusa x Medusa x c99 | 12 |
| Power Kush x Skunk #1 x c99 | 7 |
| C99 X Lemon pie | 4 |
| cinderella 99 x Cheese | 3 |
How common and how pricey is Cinderella 99 on dispensary menus?
In our Weedmaps snapshot of 27 US markets (Oct 3, 2026), 46 store listings within 50 miles of each market's center carried Cinderella 99 flower, in 8 of the 27 markets: the 10th most of the 16 strains we track.2
In New York, its median exact-eighth price was $29.52, against $35.00 for the typical other strain on the same menus (9 strains priced).2 That makes it cheaper than the typical strain there.
| Market | Cinderella 99 (priced eighths) | Typical other strain | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| New York, NY | $29.52 (10) | $35.00 (9 strains) | −$5.48 |
Markets where Cinderella 99 and at least 3 other strains each had 10+ priced exact eighths. "Typical other strain" is the median of the other strains' medians. Source: Weedmaps public menus, snapshot Oct 3, 2026.2
What this data cannot tell you
- Which terpene leads test by test: only 5 of the 598 tests report at least five individual terpenes; the analysis needs 20.1
- Which strains have a similar terpene mix: needs at least 30 tests with individual terpene values (5 here).1
- A particular jar: lab results describe flower sold under the name across 6 states from 2015 to 2023; only a batch’s own certificate of analysis describes that batch.1
- Effects: these are chemistry measurements. None of them predicts how a strain will feel to a particular person.
Check the numbers
Every figure on this page is computed from the 598 tests in the downloadable file, the same file behind the THC and terpenes page, plus the lab summaries of 29 strains processed with the same rules.
To see how Cinderella 99 compares with every strain in the network, side by side, read the network strain lab report.
License: CC BY 4.0. Credit: “Source: Cannlytics, cannabis_results (CC BY 4.0), analysis by Official Cannabis.” The data were filtered, de-duplicated and aggregated from the original.
Sources
- Cannlytics (CC BY 4.0), cannabis_results: public state lab results (filtered and aggregated by Official Cannabis). Accessed Oct 3, 2026.
- Weedmaps listings, compiled by Official Cannabis, Weedmaps flower menu snapshot, 27 US markets, Oct 3, 2026. Accessed Oct 3, 2026.
- Leafly, Cinderella 99 strain information. Accessed Oct 3, 2026.
- AllBud, Cinderella 99 marijuana strain information and reviews. Accessed Oct 3, 2026.
- Herbies, C99 seeds (Female Seeds). Accessed Oct 3, 2026.
- The Cannigma, Cinderella 99 strain (2020-12-09). Accessed Oct 3, 2026.